Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Emilien Demanet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve points won, Demanet has a slight edge, securing 40.3% compared to Bailly's 39.88%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match?
• When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Bailly leads with 45.68%, while Demanet has managed 44.59%, suggesting Bailly might have a stronger return game.
• On first serve returns, Demanet excels, winning 34.03% of points compared to Bailly's 28.93%, providing Demanet with a potential advantage in breaking serves.
• Under pressure, measured by breakpoints saved, Demanet narrowly surpasses Bailly, saving 47.17% of breakpoints compared to Bailly's 46.33%.
• Looking at overall match performance in the last year, Bailly has a higher win rate at 68.49% versus Demanet's 60.87%, indicating a general consistency in performance.
• Both players have specific surface strengths: Demanet performs best on Clay with a 59% win record, while Bailly excels on Hard courts with a 69% win rate. How will the surface of the current event influence the match?
• Both players compete primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Bailly winning 68.66% of matches, slightly more than Demanet's 61.76%, hinting at Bailly's higher match level consistency.
• Bailly has faced slightly tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 393.99 compared to Demanet's 416.41, which may attribute to Bailly's resilience under pressure.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Bailly has the upper hand, winning 54% of deciding sets in contrast to Demanet's 44%. Will this impact the match outcome?
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, both players are nearly equal, with Demanet at 38.61% and Bailly at 38.54%, suggesting neither has a solid edge in key moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Demanet and Bailly promises to be closely contested, with both players showcasing strengths in different statistical areas. Demanet's superior performance on first serve returns may offer opportunities to break Bailly's serve and gain an edge in crucial moments of the match.

On the other hand, Bailly's consistency across the past year and superior return game on second serves positions them as a potential favorite, particularly given their record in deciding sets.

While both players have comparable breakpoint conversion success, Bailly's ability to compete against higher-ranked opponents and their higher overall win percentage suggest they might have a slight edge heading into the match.

Based on an analysis of the available data, Bailly appears more likely to emerge victorious in this closely matched tennis battle.